Now the socialists, led by their leader Barack Obama pulling puppet strings on Adam Schiff, are on the grand stage: the floor of Congress and a national television audience, with Adam playing Patrick Henry, evoking the founding fathers, while pissing on the constitution and rule of law. All the while, a band of young brainwashed reporters shriek incessantly to take down the Democratically elected, capitalist Donald, so that power can be restored to its rightful socialist throne.
We say it’s Barack Obama and his gang pulling Schiff’s strings and directing the whole illegal, politically-driven impeachment charade through Congress, because it has all the elements of an Alinsky-style attack: media-driven shaming and hysteria, a total trashing of the constitution and rule of law, while wrapping their argument in “right” and “truth,” all the while attacking the duly elected Trumpster, an evil capitalist, in order to take him down in the nastiest, most unethical way possible, because they can’t beat him at the polls.
Barack learned his Alinsky skills in Chicago, after Saul had died in 1972 soon after the publication of his Rules for Radicals, dedicated to Lucifer, on ways to “community organize” by “rubbing raw the sores of discontent” and attacking institutions of government to bring power and radical social change for the “have nots.”
The Rules were supplemented by Barack’s other Chicago mentor, Bill “I hate (white) America” Ayers, the 1960s bomb making “communist with a small c,” who, along with his Weather Undergound wife Bernadine Dohrn, took Alinsky’s Rules a step further and taught them to Barack: to take down all institutions of “white supremacy” – capitalism and government and the middle class along with their constitutional rules, which were made by and for rich white people, and create a utopian socialist world, with them as leaders, of course.
Why didn’t Barack tell us this when he ran on Hope and Change? Or why, when the Donald got elected, did Barack not say his return to community organizing would be that taught by Saul Alinsky.
As Saul taught his disciples:
“You only get power as a reaction to a threat.”
“Organizing is ‘an ability to act’ in order to leverage for power.”
“All progress comes as a response to a threat, and the reaction to the threat is where you get progress.”
Saul also said: “In war, the end justifies almost any means.” In other words, do anything you need to do to win. And, coming from Chicago, it usually involved baseball-bat-to-the-knees politics. Saul, in his early days as a criminology student at the University of Chicago, studied Al Capone’s gang from the inside.
One other bit of trivia before we get to impeachment: the friendly-sounding “Progressive” was a term interchangeable with “Communist” in 1930s and 40s Chicago, during the heyday of the Communist Party USA, until it was resurrected by Ayers/Dohrn and other commie wannabes who wanted to remain anonymous underground.
In addition to Bernadine and Bill becoming Barack’s mentors and surrogate parents, his political career was launched from the Ayers/Dohrn living room in 1995, actualizing another Alinsky tenent: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.”
So fast forward to when the Donald, in a fairly decided democratic election, took Barack’s White House Power that was ready to be turned over to Hillary, who, by the way, wrote her senior thesis at Wellesley on Saul.
Ever since the Donald’s inauguration, principally through the news network Barack created, CNN, they have been trying to take him down, using Alinsky tactics of fearmongering, demonizing and a steady stream of character assassinating lies to take him down.
That’s why, ever since the Donald stole Barack’s and the socialists’ power of the White House in the fair and democratically-decided 2016 election, they have worked relentlessly and ruthlessly to take him out, using Alinsky tactics of fearmongering and chaos to retake their power.
First, for two solid years, there was the hysterical, media-driven “Russian Collusion” narrative, led by CNN, with leaks to the media of both false and classified information from old Obama government friends and officials, including former FBI Director James Comey and Adam Schiff, to fuel the flames of Trump-the-corrupt-tyrant narrative.
In between, came the Alinsky attacks at the Senate hearings for conservative Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, complete with a female witness who came out of the blue to say a drunken Brett attacked her at a high school party, and angry lesbians chasing undecided Senators into elevators before television cameras screeching, “I was raped. Don’t you care about sexually abused women?”
To hell with the constitutional process and rule of law in appointing judges. We’ll “rub raw the sores of discontent,” in Saul’s words, in the kangaroo court of public opinion.
Then there was the MeToo movement, which Michelle and Senior Barack Advisor Valerie Jarrett have acknowledged being leaders of, which takes down mostly influential Republican men, without due process or rule of law in the kangaroo media court for such crimes as “inappropriate contact,” accusations made by anonymous females.
Now we have Obama comrade Adam Schiff, who came up with an anonymous “whistle blower” out of the blue, a name only he knew, who had supposedly been informed by several people in the intelligence community about a phone call the Donald made with the president of the Ukraine in which Schiff said there was a quid pro quo on Trump’s part, bribing the Ukraine president to investigate Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, or else he would withhold U.S. military aid.
But if one followed the rules of evidence, there was no quid pro quo, because the Donald immediately released the transcript of the call, showing there was none, and the president of the Ukraine said as much, but the Schiff narrative was out in blazing force from Barack’s favorite news outlets CNN and the New York Times and The Washington Post. It quickly morphed into Trump trying to influence the 2020 election by going after a political rival, Biden, so we had another Trump foreign collusion story spread throughout the land.
No mention in any of the media, except for Fox, who have been branded “conservative” and not to be trusted, that Joe Biden, when Vice President for Barack, was recorded saying he threatened the Ukrainians to withhold a billion dollars in aid if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into corruption at Burisma, an oil and gas company where Joe’s son, Hunter, was on the board receiving millions in payments for doing nothing. But that’s real investigative journalism, which has been destroyed because most of the corruption under Obama, including that of Hillary, is Democrat, and not allowed.
So with this new narrative of a corrupt Trump spewed out through television sets and on internet screens throughout the land, Schiff, as head of the House Intelligence Committee, launched his own impeachment investigation, when such an investigation by law should have been undertaken by the House Judiciary Committee. But no matter, the pubic did know this minor detail of constitution law, and CNN wasn’t about to tell them.
Schiff ramrodded the process Alinsky style with his own new set of rules, holding secret hearings in the basement of Congress, calling his witnesses, while excluding Republican witnesses or the President’s lawyers from the process, and no Trump phone transcript of the call which revealed no quid pro quo.
But the demon CNN-driven impeachment horse was already out of the flaming barn, keeping the false narrative alive almost every minute of every news day (“keep the pressure on, never let up” Saul said), even when Schiff’s witnesses in open testimony could only come up with hearsay evidence of Trump’s alleged wrongdoing, testimony that would never hold up in a court of law.
But that didn’t stop Schiff from going into his underground bunker and emerging with his articles of impeachment – Abuse of Power and Contempt of Congress – which are not impeachable High Crimes and Misdemeanors as outlined in the Constitution. But then, Schiff’s plan was never to use constitutional rules. His were Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.
But still no matter. Schiff and the brainwashed media were the new interpreters of the constitution and these were impeachable crimes. Then Nancy Pelosi – who got to her? – allowed them to be voted on by the Democratically controlled House, with some representatives saying they were told if they didn’t vote for them, they could forget about expecting another term — another Alinsky-style bullying threat.
Nancy, who said she was on board with the urgency of the impeachment to rid the country of this tyrant, held off sending them to the Senate for trial, saying she wanted to make sure the Republican leaders of the Senate would be “fair.” It also gave time to make us all worry over the holidays – stir up more discontent on the Donald – as well as keep the words Trump and Impeachment in the minds of voters as we headed into the 2020 primary season.
When the articles were sent to the Senate, Schiff and his crew suddenly said there was more impeachable information that needed to be considered, so dumped documents on the Senate doorstep, again, totally against the rules of impeachment – Schiff should have done a thorough job preparing the case – but in line with Saul’s No. 4 Rule: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If a rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all their own rules.”
Then, when the national television audience was turned to Schiff and his opening arguments on his articles, he took on the role of the statesman, which is also what Saul said to do: pretend you are acting from a higher moral purpose, when in reality you are doing any and all to win, ethics or rule of law be damned.
As the New York Times reported:
“Invoking the nation’s founders and their fears that a self-interested leader might subvert democracy for his own personal gain, Mr. Schiff argued that the president’s conduct was precisely what the framers of the Constitution had in mind when they devised the remedy of impeachment, one he (Schiff) said was ‘as powerful as the evil it was meant to combat.’
“If not remedied by his conviction in the Senate, and removal from office, President Trump’s abuse of his office and obstruction of Congress will permanently alter the balance of power among the branches of government,” Mr. Schiff said in his opening remarks. ‘The president has shown that he believes that he’s above the law and scornful of constraint,’” wrote the Times.
Unfortunately for most viewers at home and offices who tuned into CNN and the other networks, and still believe that the Fourth Estate is to protect us and the constitution from tyranny, not create or protect it, had no clue that Schiff and his socialists are steam-rolling the constitution, while the media has turned the democratic process and rule of law into a kangaroo court with predetermined outcome, which, by the way, Hitler used to great effect to get rid of his political enemies.
Then, in a final flourish, Schiff quoted a warning to those in the chamber that he said came from an “anonymous” Republican who he said had threatened other Republicans who might vote to impeach Trump, telling them they must vote with Trump or end up with their “head on a pike.”
Now there’s a Chicago threat for which Saul, and Barack, would be proud.