Saul Alinsky, the famous, original “community organizer” from Chicago and Barack Obama’s patron saint in ways to “rub raw the sores of discount to organize for radical social change,” was never about playing by the rules.
In fact, Saul distained rules. Rules of law were made up by the establishment to protect itself. His book Rules for Radicals were tactics to employ to attack the establishment – ethics and morality and rule of law be damned. Saul emphasized his win-at-all-costs philosophy by dedicating his book to Lucifer.
Then there is Barack’s other mentor from Chicago, the 1960s bomb making terrorist, Bill “I hate (white) America” Ayers, a self-described “communist with a small c,” who at age 74 still hopes to dismantle his hated “system of white supremacy,” namely capitalism and the white middle class, before he joins Alinsky and Lucifer for eternity.
In addition to teaching Barack the finer points of his Marxist ideology, laced with Alinsky, and helping launch Barack’s political career, Ayers and his fellow terrorist wife Bernadine Dohrn adopted and raised Chesa Boudin from age two, whose parents were also comrades from the 1970s Weather Underground, David Gilbert and Cathy Boudin.
David and Cathy were unable to nurture Chesa because they were in prison for a 1981 Brinks truck armed robbery in New Jersey that left a security guard and two police officers dead. Gilbert is still in prison in upstate New York for 75 years to life, while Cathy, who drove the getaway car, got out in 2003 and is now teaching at Columbia University.
Chesa grew up in Ayers’ and Dorhn’s Chicago household to become a Marxist socialist and Yale Law grad, and was recently elected State’s Attorney of San Francisco – where else? – and vows to end mass incarceration, as well as not prosecute people in San Fran for defecating or shooting up in public, or soliciting for prostitution. Boudin is a living example of Saul Alinsky’s dictum: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits, and infiltrate the system from within.”
Why didn’t Barack tell us these things? Did he think we wouldn’t elect him knowing that his Hope and Change meant Saul’s radical social change?
While in the White House, Barack was able to reshaped many news organizations, most notably CNN, the New York Times and The Washington Post, and a host of others, installing reporters who were aligned with the socialist cause – saving the plant while taking down capitalism, flooding the borders here and in Europe with poor, terrified refugees and calling them Dreamers and immigrants – but most importantly learning to demonizing Republicans, i.e. capitalists, by making the word conservative synonymous with racist, homophobic plantation owners.
When the Donald was unfortunately elected in 2016, they didn’t miss a beat, casting the democratically elected president as the enemy, trying to take him down first with an invented Russian collusion story that was hysterically spewed into our living rooms by CNN for two years.
Now we have another fake, Alinsky demonizing bomb attack to impeach the Donald and in the process spread the news through the land, in airports and offices and schools via CNN, with angry editorials in the NYTimes and Washington Post, to scare the electorate and young children that Trump is a dictator and crook, just as we are heading into the 2020 election.
So up pops wide-eyed Adam Schiff, Barack’s good friend, head of the Intelligence Committee and former head leaker of fake information on the Russian Collusion story, as the new lead Alinsky attack dog on the Donald.
Schiff rose out of complete obscurity to the forefront of national news, revealing that an anonymous whistleblower that only he and his circle of Democrats knew the identity of, who had been informed by some equally anonymous government and intelligence people that Trump had made a phone call to the Ukrainian president, threatening to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless they launched an investigation into Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, who was making some $85,000 a month from sitting on the board of a Ukraine oil and gas company with a corrupt past, in one of the most corrupt countries in the world.
But despite Trump releasing a transcript of the call, showing no quid pro quo, and the president of the Ukraine saying the same, Schiff dug up witness after witness before his committee who said there appeared to be a quid pro quo, based on loads of hearsay evidence, even though they weren’t on the call.
So with impeachment hysteria bomb lit by the media, as it did in the Russian Collusion story, Schiff was able to steamroll the constitutional rules of law, of being able to face your accuser, apart from the fact that impeachment hearings are in the constitution to be started by the House judiciary committee. But apparently somebody got to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and she let that minor constitutional detail slide and the circus begin, with witness after corrupted witness giving their demonizing opinions on the Donald.
As the hearings went to the judiciary committee, run by another Obama progressive Jerry Nadler, the head attorney of the House Intelligence Committee Democrats, Daniel Goldman, a former prosecutor who Schiff had met in the green room at CNBC, said it was his determinization that what Trump did came under “high crimes and misdemeanors” and an impeachable offense, which CNN then carried hysterically to the nation under the subheading “Presidency in Peril.”
Schiff’s committee then proceeded to draft articles of impeachment against Trump for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress, which are not crimes under the law and thus not impeachable offences, but that didn’t stop them.
Even Newt Gingrich, who headed the Republicans with Clinton’s impeachment trial and who surely hated Billy as much as anyone, dropped an Abuse of Power charge against him because he knew it was not a crime. What Clinton was eventually charged with were real crimes, like perjury and obstruction of justice, but we were told by the new media is that this Trump impeachment is simply because he is under more scrutiny than the others. Heck with the constitution.
Because under Alinsky, you either make up your own rules, or steamroll over existing laws, whichever it takes to win.
The Republicans never got to bring their own witnesses to testify on the Ukraine call, or learn who the mysterious whistleblower was who started it all. But who needs constitutional rules and laws when you’re trying to take down a democratically-elected president?
The articles of impeachment have been sent to the full House for a vote, so we’ll see if the rest of the Democrats will follow the recommendations like sheep, or realize that the process was a corruption of the constitution. In the Republican-controlled senate, it will get voted down. Everyone knows that. If there was real concern the impeachment would take place, the stock market, the smartest thing on the planet, would have dropped in half.
Barack and his Alinskyites know this, as well. It’s all about making a fearmongering spectacle and trashing the constitution for political advantage, with the help of a media that has been just as corrupted as Shiff and Nadler and the others who came to testify with their hearsay.
They want to stir fear and chaos and doubt Alinsky style throughout the nation – rub raw the sores of discontent – to win political points among those who don’t really understand the stupidity in Congress, but only see the inquisition on CNN, assuming it’s fair and honest journalism, not socialist propaganda trying to take down a democratically elected, capitalist president.
Yet there’s another reason for the media impeachment circus at this particular time: to distract us as a nation from Barack’s very real high crimes and misdemeanors when he was president, the worst that have ever occurred in the 243 years since the founding of the republic, which make Watergate seem like kindergarteners stealing from a candy jar.
On the day that Schiff was dragging up his university professors, experts in constitutional law, to declare that what Trump did was impeachable, another hearing was being held before in the Senate Judiciary committee, where the Inspector General of the Justice Department, Michael Horowitz, was giving his report on his investigation over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court warrants that were used to authorize spying on the Trump campaign in 2016.
The FISA court was set up to develop and authorize surveillance on foreign spies at work in the United States, not spy on presidential candidates. But what happened in the Obama Justice Department was there were four FISA warrants authorized to spy on Trump’s campaign when it appeared his campaign was gaining steam.
It was part of a grand scheme that involved the head of the CIA, John Brennan, the National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former Director of National Intelligence, Secretary of State John Kerry and directed from the Obama Oval Office to derail the Trump campaign, including the manufacture of a fake dossier on Trump, paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee and facilitated through the FBI by James Comey, that manufactured evidence of Russian Collusion and taken to the FISA Court.
But Horowitz didn’t talk about that. He is an FBI bureaucrat who only was allowed to talk to FBI employees and concluded that while there were errors in the FISA warrants “we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced” officials decision to open the investigation into Trump, which the New York Times blared in a headline “Debunks Anti-Trump Plot.”
The entire mainstream media latched onto and reported the “no political bias” angle of the FISA investigation. Even James Comey weighed in the same day with an op-ed in the Washington Post, confirming that there was no political bias in the FISA process. You remember Comey. He’s the former FBI Director for Obama who was fired by Trump and later went on to greater fortune by giving classified memos of his conversation with the Donald to the New York Times, a felony, and have someone write a book under his name – A Higher Loyalty – which went to the top of the best seller list with the promotional help of CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post.
But there was a massive plot, directed by Barack’s White House to stop Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, by far the most corrupt in American political history. The scheme was unbelievably sophisticated, involving top Obama officials and orchestrated from the Obama Oval office, but the mainstream media won’t report on it. That’s because in addition to being trained attack dogs going for Trump’s jugular to take him down, they are at the same time prevented from reported on Barack’s massive corruption of the Constitution and rule of law to go after a political opponent.
This so-called Spygate Scandal has been reported in depth by only a few investigative agencies, such as the watchdog group Judicial Watch, the alternative news group The Epoch Times, and some conservative commentators like Fox’s Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs. But as we know, conservatives are racist homophobes and can’t be trusted.
Attorney General William Barr, who said the IG report was a “travesty,” has appointed U.S. Attorney John Durham, known as an investigative bulldog, to look into the origins of the fake Trump dossier, and he recently turned his probe into a criminal investigation. But Durham’s report won’t be completed until spring, so until then Barack, even with the Republicans voting down impeachment, will have plenty of time during the primaries to launch more Alinsky attacks, demonizing Trump from inside his Georgetown mansion, with hopes of driving votes to the Progressives.
And the attack-dogs in the mainstream media will have more time to pretend they’re real journalists, fighting against government corruption and protecting the constitution and rule of law, which should help us all sleep better at night.