James Comey hit the talk show and news show circuit over the weekend, touting his new book, “A Higher Loyalty,” and taking to his moral pulpit with the help of journalists, warning the country of the dangers he sees that Donald Trump poses to the country.
With ABC News 20/20 host George Stephanopolos, Comey said that, as described in his new book, Mr. Trump “cavorted” with prostitutes in Moscow, leaving him vulnerable to blackmail by the Russians, that he was “incinerating the country’s crucial norms and traditions like a wildfire,” according to the New York Times, which only prints “News that’s fit to print.” And he compared the president to a mafia boss.
“Our president must embody respect and adhere to the values that are at the core of this country,” Mr. Comey told Stephanopoulos in deeply concerned and serious tones, heavy bags under his eyes presumably from the heavy moral burden he carries. “The most important (value) being truth. This president is not able to do that. He is morally unfit to be president.”
Comey’s crusade of morality and truth, naturally, was being carried with great relish not just by George Stephanopoulos but by all the east coast media – CNN of course, The New York Times, The Washington Post, all the internet news services – so America would be adequately informed of the latest testimony to The Donald’s moral character, so maybe we can start the petition to impeach him for being a moral reprobate, to heck with how he’s running the country.
Buried in the new media onslaught anointing Comey’s as the new Moses was a tweet by the Donald, who said Comey, his former deputy director Andrew McCabe and others had “committed many crimes,” including lying to congress about the investigation into Hillary’s now destroyed e-mails while he was head of the FBI.
But who can believed The Donald when Comey was being put through our television screens like the Pope by the media as our new defender of Democracy and Truth and the American Way? None of the mainstream media ever acknowledged the Donald speaking the truth before, even though the whole Russian collusion investigation has turned up nothing and appears to be a witch-hunt. So why should we believe him now?
Turns out that while The Donald may have had some women problems in his past, he’s the one who’s telling the truth on this one. The story is brewing as a case of corruption that goes all the way From Barack Obama’s Oval Office, into the Justice Department and FBI, all to help Hillary defeat The Donald in the last election. Barack Obama is turning out to be not the Great Diversifier with the beautiful smile, but a sleazy Chicago politician who came from a system where corruption is routine, if not legal. Whether Congress has the balls to go after him like they did Nixon remains to be seen.
The only group that has been following the story with any kind of objectivity for the past year has been a watchdog group called Judicial Watch. They are a non-partisan, non-profit group out of Washington that has assigned itself the task that the legal profession and government abide by the law.
If you believe Judicial, which I do partly because CNN and the others don’t report their findings, here’s what happened:
Back in early 2016, when it looked like The Donald had a chance to be President, Barack and Hillary and the DOJ ordered a fake dossier be produced, showing The Russians colluded with The Donald to influence the American election. The dossier was fake from the get-go, but that didn’t stop the Obama folks from sending it on to the FISA Court for a warrant to spy on The Donald. The warrant was given to two FBI agents who were having an affair, who had exchanged some 30,000 emails together, many of which was how they hated Trump and feared him getting to be president.
Those two agents also had the Hillary email investigation, which we found out in the Stephanopoulos interview included over 100,000 emails, that is emails beyond the 20,000 to 30,000 that she destroyed with acid wash from her private server while Secretary of State. Those agents were reporting back to Barack, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing.”
Meanwhile, Robert Mueller was given the role as special counsel to look into the Russian collusion, not reporting to Congress or anyone else, except CNN, which was constantly leaked information from the Justice Department and FBI and ran hysterical Russian stories on Trump for over a year, without any substance of collusion, interspersed with their own investigative digging of his past affairs.
Then there was Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who despite massive contributions from Clinton ally Terry mcAluiffe to McCabe’s wife’s 2015 poltical campaign, did not recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation until just a week before the 2016 election. He also used FBI resources for his wife’s campaign. McCabe became one of CNN’s best sources before he was fired. Both McCabe and Comey look as if in the Clinton probe they lied to Congress, which used to be a crime.
Then there was Comey, who played Hamlet, waffling on the Clinton investigation because on one hand his duty was to serve as FBI Director for the American people and prosecute the investigation, which was later changed to an “inquiry,” and on the other hand was hearing from President Obama that he wanted the matter dropped, because Hillary has his designated replacement. Both McCabe and Comey look as if in the Clinton probe they lied to Congress, which back in the day was considered a crime.
Comey, as we know, was fired by Trump, but not until he arranged a meeting with The Donald after the Man with the Golden Hair was sworn in, and wrote copious notes of the conversation afterwards, which formed the basis for his book, “A Higher Loyalty,” (to God? To Barack?).
Problem was, those notes were legally the property of the FBI and shouldn’t have been written in a book, and could, under the law even send Comey to jail. Interestingly, the only person who comes out looking well in the book is one Barack Obama, portrayed as a kind hearted soul.
If half of this is true, it maks Watergate seem like child’s play. They are, after all, politicians from Chicago. Nixon was just a rube from Whittier, CA.
In his eight years as President, Barack Obama and his Chicago pals were able to restructure the major media networks, especially CNN, and put in his people trained in the Saul Alinsky school of journalism – stirring up fear and chaos, demonizing Trump and Republicans in general, and being relentless in their negative news so that people don’t know what the truth is and as Saul preached: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will become a positive.” There are still a number of former Obama staffers at CNN, including his former senior advisor and spin master David Axelrod.
Now comes James Comey as the latest Trump demonizer and purveyor of Alinsky doubt and What is Truth?
Just remember, Saul Alinsky dedicated his book “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer, the “first radical, and we all know where Lucifer stood on spreading doubt and lies and creating chaos to keep people from The Truth.